The National Arts Council of Zimbabwe (NACZ) has urged stakeholders in the arts industry to establish their own awards instead of relying solely on the National Arts Merit Awards (Nama), which often faces criticism over its selection process. The call comes amid growing concerns from arts enthusiasts who question the credibility and transparency of the awards, particularly following the recent announcement of nominees for the 23rd edition.
Speaking at a press conference, NACZ director Napoleon Nyanhi acknowledged the concerns but defended the adjudication process, stating that while Nama is not perfect, the organization has implemented measures to ensure fairness and accountability. He emphasized that the awards are meant to celebrate artistic excellence and suggested that different sectors should establish their own awards rather than focusing all expectations on Nama.
Despite this defense, critics argue that instead of suggesting alternative awards, NACZ should focus on refining Nama into a more inclusive and transparent event. The omission of certain artists, such as Feli Nandi, has reignited debates about the selection criteria, with some questioning why her name was left out while other female musicians like Dorcas Moyo, Tamy Moyo, Shashl, and Janet Manyowa made the list. Her manager, Connie Mazani, responded diplomatically, stating that they would work harder for future recognition.
Additionally, concerns have been raised over the exclusion of the Sungura genre, which remains one of Zimbabwe’s most popular music styles. Similar frustrations have been voiced in previous years, with artists like Killer T and Edith WeUtonga publicly criticizing the awards for perceived bias in the adjudication process. These past controversies have led to calls for a complete overhaul of the system, with many suggesting that industry stakeholders, rather than NACZ, should take the lead in forming adjudication panels. Others believe public participation should be expanded beyond the existing People’s Choice category to ensure a more representative selection process.
Nyanhi maintained that the adjudication process is thorough and that only deserving artists receive awards. He dismissed allegations of bias, explaining that adjudicators work independently and are not influenced by personal connections. While he acknowledged that disagreements over nominees are common in awards ceremonies worldwide, he assured that Nama remains committed to fairness and continuous improvement.
As preparations for the March 1 event continue, NACZ insists that Nama remains a credible platform for recognizing artistic excellence, but the ongoing criticism highlights the need for greater transparency and inclusivity in future editions.
