In a landmark moment for Zimbabwe’s higher education sector, Honourable Dr. F. M. Shava, Minister of Higher and Tertiary Education, Innovation, Science and Technology Development, officially launched the Model and Benchmarking Policy on Anti-Sexual Harassment for Higher and Tertiary Education Institutions at the Management Training Bureau. This launch signals a profound shift in how Zimbabwe addresses the deeply entrenched problem of sexual harassment across its colleges, universities, and training centres.
In his impassioned address, Dr. Shava called the occasion both an “honour and a solemn responsibility,” underscoring the urgency of the policy as more than a bureaucratic exercise but rather a transformative call to action. His words reflected a broader recognition that sexual harassment is not only a gross violation of human rights but also a corrosive force that erodes academic freedom and fosters climates of fear, exclusion, and intimidation, especially for women, girls, and other vulnerable groups.
The minister’s remarks were rooted in a vision of an education system that is knowledge-driven, inclusive, ethical, and aligned with both Ubuntu and universal human rights principles. “Today,” he declared, “we give concrete expression to our shared national vision,” emphasizing that the launch was not a symbolic gesture but a decisive step towards cultural transformation.
The policy itself is designed as a model and benchmarking framework, setting standards for institutions to contextualize, adopt, and implement. Dr. Shava stressed that implementation would be the true measure of success. He issued a clarion call for every higher and tertiary institution, universities, polytechnics, teachers’ colleges, industrial training centres, and research institutes, to integrate the policy into their operational fabric. This means training staff and students, establishing clear reporting and redress mechanisms, and instituting regular progress reporting to the Ministry and oversight bodies.
This new policy marks a departure from the status quo, where too many victims of sexual harassment have historically suffered in silence, their complaints stifled by fear of reprisal and systemic indifference. Dr. Shava’s acknowledgment of these lived realities reveals a ministry that is at least rhetorically aware of the complexities victims face in seeking justice. His insistence that “we will not tolerate complacency, nor will we permit resistance to accountability” represents a stern warning to institutions that might treat the policy as mere window-dressing.
Importantly, Dr. Shava credited a wide range of stakeholders, including students, lecturers, civil society organisations, legal and gender experts, traditional leaders, and development partners like the Swiss Development Agency and UNESCO, for their roles in shaping the policy. This multi-stakeholder approach reflects an understanding that combating sexual harassment cannot be left to a single ministry or institution but requires collective ownership and continuous collaboration.
Notably, the minister singled out institutions that had already begun to develop anti-sexual harassment frameworks before the policy’s launch, praising their “courage and foresight.” This recognition is essential in a context where inertia and resistance often stall policy implementation, making leadership at the institutional level critical for meaningful change.
Yet challenges remain. The policy’s success hinges not just on its adoption but on the extent to which institutions are willing to confront uncomfortable truths about power imbalances, entrenched patriarchal norms, and the normalization of silence around sexual harassment. Implementation will demand resources, training, and cultural change, all within an environment already stretched by economic and institutional pressures.
Crucially, Dr. Shava reframed the fight against sexual harassment as a societal issue, not just a women’s or students’ issue—a perspective that places responsibility on everyone, from administrators and educators to parents and policymakers. By declaring that “it will take all of us working collectively, intentionally, and courageously to uproot it,” he underscored that progress cannot be achieved through policy alone but must be underpinned by deep cultural shifts and sustained action.
As Zimbabwe’s higher education sector embraces this new policy framework, it now faces the real test: turning words into action, frameworks into lived realities, and promises into protection for every student and staff member. The launch of this policy is undeniably a milestone. Whether it becomes a turning point depends on the unwavering commitment of institutions, communities, and the government itself to uphold the dignity, safety, and rights of every person in Zimbabwe’s learning spaces.
