Government’s Vetting of Land Beneficiaries to Boost Agricultural Productivity

The Zimbabwean government has introduced strict vetting measures for land allocation to ensure that only capable and serious farmers are given land. This decision comes in response to issues of underutilization and abandonment of farms by some individuals who were allocated land under the country’s land reform program. The vetting process aims to verify the capabilities of prospective farmers on the waiting list for State land, which currently includes over 270,000 Zimbabweans living in the country and 10,000 diasporans.

In his inaugural speech ushering in the Second Republic, President Mnangagwa called on beneficiaries of the Land Reform Programme to demonstrate their commitment to utilizing the land for national food security and economic recovery. He pledged to empower the Land Commission to resolve outstanding issues related to land redistribution. True to his word, his administration has now implemented a vetting process to ensure that only serious and capable farmers are allocated land.

The new vetting measures offer several advantages. They ensure that deserving people are allocated land, maximize productivity, promote rural industrialization, and encourage partnerships in farming businesses. The process also aims to reduce land reform abuse, prevent land abandonment, and enhance transparency and accountability in land allocation. Prioritizing women, youth, war veterans, and people with disabilities, the policy aims to address the needs of various demographic groups and promote the corporate model for farming. Furthermore, it encourages Zimbabweans in the diaspora to participate in national development.

The adoption of the corporate model of farming is expected to transform Zimbabwe’s agriculture sector, making it more competitive, sustainable, and profitable. This model will also create jobs, improve food security, and increase the sector’s contribution to the country’s GDP. President Mnangagwa has reminded Zimbabweans from across the political divide that reclaiming ancestral land was a fundamental reason for the liberation struggle. He emphasized that it would be a betrayal to those who sacrificed their lives if the gains made in reclaiming land were reversed. Now that the land is in the hands of its people, the focus must shift to enhancing productivity as the pathway to attaining national food security.

This introduction of strict vetting measures marks a significant step towards realizing Zimbabwe’s agricultural potential and ensuring that land reform contributes positively to the nation’s development goals. By ensuring that only committed and capable farmers receive land, the government aims to maximize the productivity and sustainability of the country’s agricultural sector, ultimately contributing to the broader goal of national food security and economic recovery.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


New Tourism Strategy Aims to Empower Local Communities

The tourism sector is set for a transformation as the Tourism and Hospitality Industry Minister, Barbara Rwodzi, calls for greater collaboration with local communities to enhance their well-being. Speaking at the inaugural Tourism and Conservation Conference in Harare yesterday, Minister Rwodzi highlighted the critical role of community involvement in the future of tourism. The event, […]

Read More

Government Moves to Improve Transparency

On July 10, 2024, the Government took a significant step towards enhancing transparency and accountability in service delivery by launching the Zimbabwe Inter-Governmental Fiscal Transfers System (IGFTS) Administrative Manual. This initiative aims to streamline the management and processing of devolution funds, ensuring they are utilized in a responsible manner. Since its inception, the Second Republic, […]

Read More

Mutapa Investment Fund (MIF) – Zim’s 4th Chimurenga

The Sentry’s latest report on the Mutapa Investment Fund (MIF) has been met with scepticism and criticism, suggesting potential wrongdoing or unethical behaviour. The report uses language such as “raises concerns,” “overvaluation of shares,” and “transfer of public wealth to private individuals,” indicating a negative perspective on the MIF’s dealings. However, it is essential for […]

Read More