However, SADC has firmly denied any such involvement, calling the allegations “inaccurate and misleading.” The regional body emphasized that SAMIDRC has not engaged in any joint military operations as alleged and that its actions remain aligned with a directive from the SADC Summit of Heads of State and Government. Notably, SAMIDRC is currently undergoing a structured and coordinated withdrawal from the DRC, reflecting a de-escalation strategy agreed upon by regional leaders.
The timing of the M23 statement, just weeks after a consultative engagement between SADC and M23 leadership in Goma on 28 March 2025, raises concerns about the credibility and intent behind the accusations. SADC has reaffirmed its commitment to the outcomes of that dialogue, stating that it continues to support peaceful, diplomatic channels to resolve the long-standing instability in eastern DRC. This response underscores SADC’s stance on multilateralism, dialogue, and the principle of non-interference, even while acknowledging the complex web of actors in the conflict-ridden region.
The broader implication of the press release is a call for restraint and truth in the information space. As conflicts in the Great Lakes region are increasingly shaped by narratives and media influence, SADC’s response not only defends its mission’s integrity but also calls on all stakeholders to avoid disinformation and instead prioritize the collective goal of restoring peace and stability.
In a region where trust deficits and proxy tensions remain high, SADC’s firm but diplomatic stance serves to maintain its credibility as a peacekeeping force. Whether this will temper the rhetoric from M23 or lead to renewed tensions remains to be seen—but for now, SADC has drawn a clear line in defense of its mission and regional diplomatic consensus.
